New Genetics, Food & Agriculture: Scientific Discoveries - Societal Dilemmas


BIBLIOGRAPHY

For each review selected for inclusion, an abstract, annotated bibliographic entry and full report (where available) are provided. For ease of use, the Bibliography has been divided into three sections:                                                                   

International
Academies of Science 2000;   ADB 2001;  CGIAR 2000a, 2000b;   IFPRI 2001;   ISNAR 2002a, 2002b; EC 2001a, 2001b, 2002; EEA 2002; IDB 2002; ICSU 2002; IUNS/IUTOX 2002; ISAAA 2001, 2002a, 2002b; OECD 2000a, 2000b, 2001a, 2001b; FAO/WHO 2000, 2001a, 2001b; UNDP 2001; Vatican 2001;

National
Australia, Commonwealth 2000; Belgium, VIB 2001; Canada, Royal Society 2001 & CBAC 2001, 2002; Denmark, DANIDA 2002; France, Academie des sciences 2002; New Zealand, Royal Commission 2001; UK, Nuffield Council on Bioethics 1999 & The Royal Society 2001; USA, National Research Council 2000, National Academy of Sciences 2002, Council for Agricultural Science and Technology 2002, National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy 2002, Pew Initiative 2001, 2002 & 2003, Society of Toxicology 2002;

Scientific Journals, Review Articles and Monographs
Plant Journal 2001: Bowles & Klee; Toenniessen; Shelton & Sears; Perlak et al; Kuiper et al; Plant Journal 2002: Groot & Dicke; Kowalski et al; Pray et al; Plant Journal 2003: Nap et al; Conner et al.  
Other articles: Dale et al, 2002; Shelton et al, 2002. Zangerl et al, 2001.
Monographs: De Vries & Toenniessen, 2001; Pardey 2001; Persley & MacIntryre,2001; Serageldin & Persley, 2003.

Back to Contents